We recently informed you of the results of the Google Transparency Report. The micro-blogging network also lends itself to the exercise by revealing. The key figures of requests made by governments and rights holders. This is the second report from Twitter, which had already posted one last July . The study also takes on particular interest when we know that France is exerting pressure to find out the identity of the authors of anti-Semitic or racist tweets.
Note the real desire for transparency on the part of Twitter, which gives particular importance to freedom of expression and the fight against censorship. Increasing requests for information “Information requests” relate to requests for information on user accounts from governments. Relatively low figures, since there were “only” 1009 requests during the second half of 2012.
Increasing Requests for Information
It is also possible to have the details of the requests. We learn in particular that France made only 12 requests against 815 for the United States. The USA also has a detailed study dedicated to them. According to Twitter, most requests come from governments seeking information about Iceland WhatsApp Number users involved in criminal cases. Content removal requests “Removal requests” relate to the deletion of data deemed illegal by governments or official jurisdictions, courts or tribunals for example.
The requests literally exploded between semester 1 and semester 2 but remain relatively few in number. The details of the requests by country are posted online. It is also Brazil that does the most, but France is likely to dethrone all the other countries in 2013. On average, Twitter removes 53% of copyright infringements submitted to it. Infringements concerned a total of 7,205 users for the second half of 2012.
Content Removal Requests
Significant figures but to be put into perspective with the 200 million active users. The French case The anti-Semitic “excesses” on the network have agitated the French political class, which has taken legal action. A Parisian court has also demanded that the network reveal the names of the authors of the incriminated tweets in order to assign them to justice. Last October, Twitter refused to provide the names of tweeters who posted abusive messages on the web with the hashtag #UnBonJuif.
The court also added that Twitter will have to implement a new system in order to report “illegal content”. This posture will certainly not be final, but it shows the difficulty of governments to control (censor?) the information issued by tweeters. So much the better ?